Lenovo F0G6009XID

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo F0G6009XID  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 374C
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '23 at 06:31
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Memory 51.4
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 85.8
46% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 85
8-Core 83.8
11% 84.4 Pts
64-Core 72.6
4% 72.6 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 374C) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 22.20.02
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
4.25% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 8
Parallax 5.2
3% 5.67 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 4
Splatting 11.2
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.25%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4256HBJD-00BL7 256GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BL2QHXC7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 839 844 905 1064 1118 1170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 796
Write 623
Mixed 639
SusWrite 990
172% 762 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 13.6
86% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 151
117% 164 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 125%
Great: 272%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3310MR86H9F-3200 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.9% Above average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 18.3
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 16.9
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 60 21.5" 1280 720 LENF918 LEN-C-A
Typical F0G6009XID Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo F0G6009XID

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback