Lenovo 255547U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 255547U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '23 at 21:22
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 163
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 381
41% 328 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 537.42
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (64 fps cap detected)
50.3% Above average
Lighting 61.7
Reflection 64.6
Parallax 64.8
50% 63.7 fps
MRender 63.7
Gravity 64.2
Splatting 58.3
50% 62.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 120GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSF036C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 394
Write 338
Mixed 325
78% 353 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 50.6
4K Mixed 26.1
91% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 227
171% 230 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 84%
GB0750C4414 750GB
549GB free
Firmware: HPG3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 15 16 18 35 32 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 154
Write 7.7
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 21.4
36% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6K1 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.4% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 16
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16.7
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 21 120 24" 1920 1017 SPT098C L24
Typical 255547U Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 255547U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $266
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback