Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire ME600

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire ME600  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire ME600
Memory1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120906
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateSep 29 '23 at 01:43
Run Duration320 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 61%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 62.9
1-Core 63.9
2-Core 124
50% 83.6 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 224
26% 204 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$40
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR021
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 170 109 59 125 123 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 353
Write 390
Mixed 311
SusWrite 156
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 20.4
70% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 248
188% 252 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$50
124GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 51 48 50 59 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 13.9
Write 67.4
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 53.3
30% 40.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 113%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
403GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.52% Terrible
Read 21.2
Write 21.8
Mixed 13.4
SusWrite 17.8
25% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.6
29% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 7.52%
Great: 61%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
388GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 3.4 3.3 3.3 2.6 0.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 1.2
Write 2
Mixed 2
SusWrite 2.8
3% 2 MB/s
4K Read 70.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.3
273% 23.7 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 73%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
643GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.6 4.5 4.7 3.4 1.1 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.59% Terrible
Read 49.8
Write 21.9
Mixed 24.2
SusWrite 3.7
28% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.8
36% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 8.59%
Great: 73%
ST8000VN 004-2M2101 8TB
2.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.73% Terrible
Read 18.9
Write 19.2
Mixed 18.2
SusWrite 0.6
18% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.4
92% 4.5 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.73%
Great: 78%
ST8000VN 0022-2EL112 8TB
600GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.6 4.5 4.7 3.4 1.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.6% Very poor
Read 55.4
Write 20.9
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 3.7
29% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 1.6
95% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 77%
ST10000D M0004-1ZC101 10TB
457GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
3.25% Terrible
Read 12.4
Write 13
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 0.8
13% 9.85 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.25%
Great: 38%
ST6000DM 003-2CY186 6TB
136GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.09% Terrible
Read 54.4
Write 20.2
Mixed 19.1
SusWrite 0.8
25% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.09%
Great: 67%
ST8000DM 004-2CX188 8TB
379GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.6 4.5 4.7 3.3 1.1 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
9.21% Terrible
Read 54.2
Write 22.2
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 3.7
28% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.7
32% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 9.21%
Great: 73%
ST4000DM 005-2DP166 4TB
446GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 93 93 94 94 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 156
Write 151
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 93.2
154% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 69%
HGST HUH 728080ALE604 8TB
4.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 92 93 94 94 95 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.4% Above average
Read 188
Write 184
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 92.5
176% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 67%
HGST HUH 728080ALE604 8TB
7TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 173 174 176 175 176 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.3% Good
Read 173
Write 188
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 172
206% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
108% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
43.8% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 10.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 54 36 32 0" 1280 720
Typical Aspire ME600 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire ME600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $312
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback