Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 397%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 527%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics363% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive379% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory54.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '23 at 06:49
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$590
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 72.9
1-Core 219
2-Core 422
122% 238 Pts
4-Core 833
8-Core 1,617
145% 1,225 Pts
64-Core 3,698
229% 3,698 Pts
Poor: 113%
This bench: 115%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 537.34
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
363% Outstanding
Lighting 579
Reflection 551
Parallax 742
472% 624 fps
MRender 501
Gravity 542
Splatting 276
343% 440 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 363%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$110
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2997 2760 871 860 838 844 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
379% Outstanding
Read 2,863
Write 3070
Mixed 2,894
SusWrite 1,528
583% 2,589 MB/s
4K Read 69.7
4K Write 207
4K Mixed 101
344% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1,566
DQ Write 1352
DQ Mixed 1,485
1,106% 1,468 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 379%
Great: 429%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190
139GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,614
Write 3,056
Mixed 2,818
635% 2,830 MB/s
4K Read 65.1
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 86.3
289% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,620
DQ Write 1,396
DQ Mixed 1,530
1,141% 1,516 MB/s
Poor: 278% Great: 508%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190
1.5TB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3135 3115 3095 3107 3105 3115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
474% Outstanding
Read 2,782
Write 3,137
Mixed 2,963
SusWrite 3,112
678% 2,998 MB/s
4K Read 68.1
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 96.2
338% 125 MB/s
DQ Read 1,631
DQ Write 1447
DQ Mixed 1,559
1,164% 1,546 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 474%
Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B6000C40 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (95th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
203% Outstanding
MC Read 141
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 55.5
227% 79.3 GB/s
SC Read 43.4
SC Write 45.4
SC Mixed 43
126% 43.9 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 119%
This bench: 203%
Great: 203%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 64.2" 1280 720 SAM73A5 QCQ95S
Typical ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $2,510
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback