Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	7.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	77.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1370P 258 User benchmarks, average bench 94% U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Memory 41.5 1-Core 51 2-Core 106 37% 66.1 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 335 30% 254 Pts	64-Core 406 25% 406 Pts
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 14,602 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Legend(17AA 2314) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	7.43% Terrible	Lighting 7.9 Reflection 13.6 Parallax 8.4 6% 9.97 fps	MRender 12.2 Gravity 13.6 Splatting 9.3 9% 11.7 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 7.43% Great: 23%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Umis RPETJ256MKP1MDQ 256GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 161% 61GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.2Q06A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 529 519 360 317 296 246 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	77.1% Very good	Read 671 Write 585 Mixed 675 SusWrite 378 130% 577 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 28.3 4K Mixed 13.8 62% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 295 DQ Write 91.1 DQ Mixed 230 160% 205 MB/s
Poor: 123% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 228%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron MT62F4G32D8DV-026 WT 8x8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 122% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	65.1% Good	MC Read 35.4 MC Write 25 MC Mixed 18.4 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 9.5 SC Mixed 10.1 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 188 21% 188 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 157%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	41	6	60	14"	1280 720	LEN4147

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 28%

Raft

CPU
Core i7-1370PIntelBench 94%, 258 samples	11x
Gen Intel Core i5-1345U13thBench 66%, 384 samples	2x
Core i7-1365UIntelBench 81%, 156 samples	2x

GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 19%, 14,602 samples	11x
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 15%, 6,283 samples	5x

SSD
LA KIOXIA 1TBKxg8aznv1t02Bench 272%, 269 samples	5x
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TBBench 286%, 17,197 samples	5x
990 Pro M.2 2TBSamsung $144Bench 449%, 61,354 samples	3x

RAM
MT62F4G32D8DV-026 WT 8x8GBMicronBench 122%, 25 samples	8x
K3KL9L90CM-MGCT 8x4GBSamsungBench 142%, 1,049 samples	3x
H58G78BK7BX114 8x8GBHynixBench 140%, 176 samples	2x