Today's hottest deals

Biostar A320MH 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive43.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A320MH 2.0  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '23 at 17:10
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
61.5% Good
Memory 51.1
1-Core 101
2-Core 218
65% 123 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 675
64% 530 Pts
64-Core 765
47% 765 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 480GB-$38
220GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900Z13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 137 138 141 146 149 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.1% Average
Read 103
Write 64.8
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 159
20% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 15.1
4K Mixed 25.7
57% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 154
138% 203 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 102%
Toshiba HDWL110 1TB
912GB free
Firmware: JU000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 94 94 93 98 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 130
Write 131
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 97.1
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.6
219% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX4U320016G16A-BB10 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
35.5% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 11.7
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 10.1
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 7 64 0" 1280 720
Typical A320MH 2.0 Builds (Compare 138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A320MH 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback