Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 03 '23 at 12:08
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$40
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 66.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 164
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 278
29% 232 Pts
64-Core 260
16% 260 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.30
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.25% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 4.2
3% 3.93 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.25%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$25
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR052
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 362 182 402 205 168 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 471
Write 358
Mixed 11
SusWrite 276
62% 279 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 14.8
41% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 141
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 23.5
56% 116 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31
802GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 153 145 155 155 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 159
Write 124
Mixed 93
SusWrite 152
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
227% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFRA32A.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
67.1% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 23.6
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 19.9
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 59 37 60 21.7" 1920 1017 GSM5ABB LG FULL HD
Typical GA-H110M-S2-CF Builds (Compare 1,970 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $182
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback