Emachines ET1358

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Emachines ET1358 (all builds)
Motherboard	eMachines ET1358
Memory	3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20110615
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 05 '23 at 13:51
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	30%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	47.8% Average	Memory 67.2 1-Core 45.7 2-Core 91.2 43% 68 Pts	4-Core 166 8-Core 162 22% 164 Pts	64-Core 153 10% 153 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 8C96) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 537.42 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.8% Poor	Lighting 34.3 Reflection 41.3 Parallax 36.7 28% 37.4 fps	MRender 36.4 Gravity 39 Splatting 27.7 28% 34.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB 15,567 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 10GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 75 87 110 88 106 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.3% Poor	Read 123 Write 94.1 Mixed 95.1 SusWrite 92.7 23% 101 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 23.2 4K Mixed 13.8 55% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 18.3 DQ Write 25.4 DQ Mixed 20.2 16% 21.3 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 88%
Seagate ST9250315AS 250GB-$30 12,691 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 65GB free Firmware: 0020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	31.2% Below average	Read 68.8 Write 67.7 Mixed 38.2 SusWrite 39.8 39% 53.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR256X64D3U1333C9 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 99U5471-002.A01LF 6GB 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.2% Poor	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 9.5 25% 8.73 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.7 16% 5.8 GB/s	Latency 107 38% 107 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	56	60	21.5"	1920 1080	SAM0D1A S22F350

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ET1358 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Emachines ET1358

CPU
Athlon II X2 220AMDBench 39%, 5,045 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x
Radeon HD 3800ATIBench 5%, 3,400 samples	1x
Radeon HD 6450AMDBench 2%, 32,407 samples	1x

SSD
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	1x

RAM
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 ACR256X64D3U1333C9 99U5471-002.A01LF 6GBKingstonBench 25%, 1 sample	1x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 Kingston ACR256X64D3U1333C9 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Kingston ACR256X64D3U1333C9 12GBSamsungBench 21%, 1 sample	1x
Dominator DDR3 1600 C8 2x2GBCorsairBench 39%, 31 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16