Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZU4_FX507ZU4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZU4_FX507ZU4  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX507ZU4
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230719
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateOct 06 '23 at 20:51
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Memory 72.4
1-Core 184
2-Core 342
105% 200 Pts
4-Core 659
8-Core 1,108
108% 884 Pts
64-Core 2,005
124% 2,005 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 278D) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 25.4
Parallax 24
15% 22.7 fps
MRender 22.5
Gravity 27.2
Splatting 19.3
18% 23 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-512G-1002 512GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73101000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,098
Write 2,360
Mixed 1,947
547% 2,468 MB/s
4K Read 64.9
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 85
289% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 1,324
DQ Write 563
DQ Mixed 1,006
728% 964 MB/s
Poor: 148% Great: 506%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE Kingston 99U5700-031.A00G 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 36.7
110% 38.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 39.6
SC Mixed 25.2
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 97.8
41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUOD2A2 B156HAN15.H
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZU4_FX507ZU4 Builds (Compare 245 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZU4_FX507ZU4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $384
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback