Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive319% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230908
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 07 '23 at 03:49
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$110
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Memory 81.4
1-Core 173
2-Core 321
103% 192 Pts
4-Core 591
8-Core 976
96% 783 Pts
64-Core 1,212
75% 1,212 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON SNV2S1000G 1TB
741GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBM02103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2335 2383 2357 971 839 850 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 2,034
Write 2,324
Mixed 1,560
SusWrite 1,622
425% 1,885 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 301
4K Mixed 52.6
315% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 785
DQ Write 1,305
DQ Mixed 615
587% 902 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 319%
Great: 341%
PNY CS900 1TB SSD
885GB free
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 428 439 455 436 340 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 277
Write 105
Mixed 358
SusWrite 420
66% 290 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 94.7
4K Mixed 35.9
145% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 196
175% 263 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX432C16FB4/16-SP 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3300 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 37.6
113% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 43.4
SC Mixed 32
97% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 240 0" 1280 720
Typical TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 2,321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $498
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback