Performance Results


Gaming 104% UFO	Desktop 107% UFO	Workstation 109% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	97.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	352% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Elite Tower 600 G9 Desktop PC (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8950
Memory	25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230725
Uptime	5.5 Days
Run Date	Oct 07 '23 at 09:56
Run Duration	212 Seconds
Run User	ALB-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-12700 25,535 User benchmarks, average bench 108% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 71.1 1-Core 189 2-Core 370 108% 210 Pts	4-Core 710 8-Core 1,213 117% 961 Pts	64-Core 1,740 108% 1,740 Pts
Poor: 100% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 115%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% HP(103C 8903) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.42 Performing below potential (30^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.9% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 115 Parallax 118 104% 120 fps	MRender 137 Gravity 99.7 Splatting 86.5 86% 108 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SK hynix BC711 HFM001TD3JX013N 1TB 222 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 560GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2071 2243 1114 831 824 822 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	352% Outstanding	Read 2,203 Write 2,312 Mixed 1,796 SusWrite 1,317 429% 1,907 MB/s	4K Read 68.4 4K Write 218 4K Mixed 98.3 345% 128 MB/s	DQ Read 1,870 DQ Write 1,601 DQ Mixed 1,693 1,280% 1,721 MB/s
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 352% Great: 352%
INTENSO 512GB 2,578 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 97GB free Firmware: V0621A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 210 55 43 23 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 483 Write 248 Mixed 24.9 SusWrite 133 49% 222 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 11.8 4K Mixed 0.7 45% 12.4 MB/s	DQ Read 80.2 DQ Write 12.6 DQ Mixed 0.7 12% 31.2 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 96%
INTENSO 512GB 2,578 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 67GB free Firmware: V0621A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 14 14 14 14 205 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	78.8% Very good	Read 482 Write 419 Mixed 411 SusWrite 88.9 78% 350 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 119 4K Mixed 28.7 146% 59.4 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 46.4 90% 175 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMCG78MEBUA081N 2x16GB 219 User benchmarks, average bench 148% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	129% Outstanding	MC Read 50.6 MC Write 50.7 MC Mixed 47.1 141% 49.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 44.5 SC Mixed 26.8 86% 30.1 GB/s	Latency 99.4 40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 118% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 202%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	24.1"	1920 1200	HWP2956 HP ZR2440w

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 98%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

CPU
Core i7-12700IntelBench 108%, 25,535 samples	21x
Core i5-12500Intel $196Bench 99%, 3,715 samples	9x
Pentium Gold G7400IntelBench 68%, 281 samples	2x

GPU
UHD Graphics 770IntelBench 8%, 19,750 samples	11x
UHD Graphics 770IntelBench 7%, 2,512 samples	9x
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	7x

SSD
hynix BC711 HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBSKBench 198%, 4,708 samples	8x
MZVLQ256HBJD-00BH1 256GBSamsungBench 115%, 2,359 samples	3x
hynix BC711 HFM001TD3JX013N 1TBSKBench 241%, 222 samples	3x

RAM
M323R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 1x16GBSamsungBench 74%, 230 samples	12x
HMCG78MEBUA081N 2x16GBHynixBench 148%, 219 samples	3x
HMCG66MEBUA081N 2x8GBHynixBench 124%, 489 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16