Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H370M D3H GSM-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H370M D3H GSM
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H370M D3H GSM-CF  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '23 at 10:17
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 82.7
1-Core 118
2-Core 234
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 630
69% 548 Pts
64-Core 662
41% 662 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 1E04) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 202
Reflection 201
Parallax 227
165% 210 fps
MRender 265
Gravity 207
Splatting 157
166% 210 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 152%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 240GB
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 334 165 178 22 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 3,430
Write 6.2
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 209
195% 933 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 23.6
92% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 0.7
59% 135 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 187%
Great: 117%
Micron_M550_MTFDDAK256MAY 256GB
142GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 438 441 454 456 458 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 392
Write 394
Mixed 282
SusWrite 445
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 31.2
107% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 229
203% 307 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 108%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
73GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 334 302 240 190 183 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 470
Mixed 453
SusWrite 274
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 71.7
4K Mixed 47.5
151% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 342
259% 347 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 99.4%
Great: 129%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$20
98GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 75 74 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 73.7
Write 72.2
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 74.1
48% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 60%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$20
427GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 96 95 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 72.8
Write 70.2
Mixed 45.4
SusWrite 95.7
52% 71 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 859B CT8G4DFRA266.M16FG 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.5% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 23.9
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 23.1
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 15 60 31.5" 1280 720 JRY0000 HDMI
Typical GA-H370M D3H GSM-CF Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370M D3H GSM-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $362
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback