Alienware Aurora-R2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware Aurora-R2  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0RV30W
Memory5.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 08 '23 at 20:01
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 93.2
1-Core 83.8
2-Core 150
67% 109 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 360
37% 298 Pts
64-Core 381
24% 381 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
Nvidia(10DE 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Lighting 19.9
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 17.8
16% 17.8 fps
MRender 21.8
Gravity 19.3
Splatting 15.3
15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03D1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 238
Write 166
Mixed 146
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 13.9
56% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 51.8
DQ Mixed 82.5
66% 96.8 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
920GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 187
Write 175
Mixed 88.2
111% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$130
7TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3450
Write 26.7
Mixed 59.6
844% 1,179 MB/s
4K Read 454
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 3.7
19,352% 153 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
SanDisk' Cruzer Fit 32GB
29GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 26.6
Write 10.2
Mixed 13.7
19% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.6
181% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BD160BJ.M8F Reboto DDR3 4gb CT51264BD160BJ.C8F Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
24.9% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 6.4
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 47 60 34" 3440 1377 SAM0F72 S34J55x
Typical Aurora-R2 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Alienware Aurora-R2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $379
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback