Medion H77H2-EM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics99.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion H77H2-EM  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H77H2-EM
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130327
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateOct 09 '23 at 09:13
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 97.9
2-Core 172
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 477
49% 397 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.2% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 117
Parallax 121
105% 122 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 102
Splatting 87.6
87% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
840GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 461
Write 398
Mixed 383
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 69.3
4K Mixed 19.3
93% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 35.5
87% 176 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 100%
Seagate ST2000NM0011 2TB-$54
2TB free
Firmware: SN02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 154
Write 32.5
Mixed 55.7
60% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC4B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 180
Write 175
Mixed 68.2
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 113%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 Max USB 3.0 32GB-$21
29GB free, PID 0247
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 328
Write 48.4
Mixed 69.1
135% 148 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.5
106% 3 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6DFR8A-PB HMT41GU6DFR8A-PB HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.3% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 16.4
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 18.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.9" 1280 720 HPN3504 HP 24y
Typical H77H2-EM Builds (Compare 183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Medion H77H2-EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $543
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback