MSI MS-16R6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 11UC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R6  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211230
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 09 '23 at 23:50
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 72
1-Core 153
2-Core 289
91% 171 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 872
87% 707 Pts
64-Core 1,070
66% 1,070 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 132E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4575
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
4.83% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 5.9
4% 7.13 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 7.3
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.83%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500P3SSD8 500GB
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1592
Write 1,785
Mixed 1,637
374% 1,671 MB/s
4K Read 59.2
4K Write 246
4K Mixed 91
337% 132 MB/s
DQ Read 1,379
DQ Write 1,031
DQ Mixed 1,053
828% 1,154 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 305%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78.6% Very good
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 24
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 17.7
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 97.2
41% 97.2 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 52 144 15.5" 1280 720 AUOAF90
Typical MS-16R6 Builds (Compare 4,093 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback