Shuttle NC10U

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemShuttle NC10U  (all builds)
MotherboardShuttle NC10U
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230308
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateOct 10 '23 at 18:01
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 4205U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 64
1-Core 45.7
2-Core 73.3
40% 61 Pts
4-Core 72.8
8-Core 81.1
10% 76.9 Pts
64-Core 56.9
4% 56.9 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
Device(1297 4079) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7755
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
2.57% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.8
Parallax 3.2
2% 2.87 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 5.3
3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.57%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Timetec 30TT253X2-256G 256GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 342
Write 303
Mixed 294
235% 313 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 14.2
3,458% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 35.3
642% 107 MB/s
USB DISK 3.0 32GB
28GB free, PID 6700
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 33.7
Write 19.7
Mixed 9
23% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
34% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS2GSH64V2B-I 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.6% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 10.9
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.9
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACI22FA VE228
Typical NC10U Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Shuttle NC10U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback