Zoostorm zoostorm

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemZoostorm zoostorm  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte H81M-DS2V
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140819
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 10 '23 at 22:02
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$20
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 50.2
1-Core 89.9
2-Core 156
55% 98.5 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 171
27% 192 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
2.7% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 4.2
2% 3.1 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.7
3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.7%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 512GB-$66
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 7ANR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 379 392 400 424 417 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 382
Write 363
Mixed 285
SusWrite 399
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 37.3
91% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 269
226% 327 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 127%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6K1 0702 51264T133I SAM 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.7% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 10.3
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 7.8
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 71 56 60 27" 1280 720 IVM6604 PL2775HD
Typical zoostorm Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Zoostorm zoostorm

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback