MSI X470 GAMING PRO MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics116% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PRO MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220713
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 10 '23 at 22:23
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 84.7
1-Core 139
2-Core 261
89% 162 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 805
77% 636 Pts
64-Core 962
60% 962 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6750-XT
XFX(1EAE 6710) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.30.01.02
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
116% Outstanding
Lighting 129
Reflection 124
Parallax 270
106% 175 fps
MRender 212
Gravity 142
Splatting 192
149% 182 fps
Poor: 124%
This bench: 116%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 62 47 54 55 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 319
Write 389
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 64.4
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 7.5
40% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 60.8
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 1.1
27% 61.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 92%
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TB
721GB free
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 55 708 70 56 696 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,994
Write 2,148
Mixed 1931
SusWrite 341
360% 1,604 MB/s
4K Read 54.6
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 58.8
194% 60.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,195
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 208
263% 502 MB/s
Poor: 115%
This bench: 190%
Great: 441%
Amd-raid Array 6 999GB
757GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 35 37 36 36 35 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.4% Below average
Read 96.7
Write 111
Mixed 66.1
SusWrite 36.3
57% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.5
139% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 206%
Amd-raid Array 2 2TB
480GB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 93 93 91 94 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 84.5
Write 47.2
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 92.2
52% 69.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.2
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 201%
Hitachi HDS72107 750GB
276GB free
Firmware: JP3O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 60 58 60 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 124
Write 125
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 58.7
66% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 78%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 34.6
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 22.7
SC Mixed 33.3
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 72.3" 1280 720 TSB0108 TOSHIBA-TV
Typical X470 GAMING PRO MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 451 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 122% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback