Today's hottest deals

Colorful H610M-E M.2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics74.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemColorful H610M-E M.2  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful H610M-E M.2
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221124
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 11 '23 at 23:01
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$112
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Memory 77.5
1-Core 173
2-Core 314
101% 188 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 993
94% 777 Pts
64-Core 1181
73% 1181 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$243
Device(7377 2000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.6% Very good
Lighting 100
Reflection 86.3
Parallax 90.5
82% 92.4 fps
MRender 85.6
Gravity 73.4
Splatting 66.1
60% 75 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Colorful CN600 512GB
393GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APF1M3R1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,184
Write 2,049
Mixed 1438
1,169% 1,557 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 65.3
11,618% 80.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,589
DQ Write 1,090
DQ Mixed 1,303
12,055% 1,327 MB/s
Lenovo USB Hard Drive 2TB
237GB free, PID 4533
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 53.4
Write 55
Mixed 34.7
60% 47.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Colorful Ltd CD16G3200D4NP18 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 13
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 0 32" 1280 720 CTV0001 CTV TV
Typical H610M-E M.2 Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

System: Colorful H610M-E M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $326
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback