Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210105
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 12 '23 at 09:31
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$98
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 71
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 235
73% 135 Pts
4-Core 375
8-Core 602
60% 488 Pts
64-Core 614
38% 614 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 28.6
17% 21.5 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 24.9
Splatting 14.6
13% 16.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1206A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 477
Write 392
Mixed 392
94% 420 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 1
84% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 38.9
75% 145 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
66GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 150 150 152 149 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 159
Write 164
Mixed 110
SusWrite 150
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.5% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 11
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 12.7
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23.5" 1920 1009 PHLC0D1 PHL 243V5
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,749 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $406
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback