Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '23 at 03:10
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 203
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 662
63% 522 Pts
64-Core 1,036
64% 1,036 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$270
EVGA(3842 3658) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 537.13
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 131
Parallax 126
113% 132 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 102
Splatting 97.6
92% 115 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
51.4% Above average
Lighting 66.3
Reflection 61.4
Parallax 86.6
54% 71.4 fps
MRender 63.2
Gravity 66.1
Splatting 45.4
46% 58.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,458
Write 2,243
Mixed 1,585
466% 2,095 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 65.2
216% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 781
DQ Write 463
DQ Mixed 660
481% 635 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Spcc Solid State Disk 2TB
177GB free
Firmware: SHFM60.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 474 458 439 469 395 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 430
Write 484
Mixed 451
SusWrite 452
103% 454 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 91.2
4K Mixed 47.9
164% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 288
240% 345 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 42.6
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 33.2
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 27.9
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 82.8
48% 82.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 209 58 60 23.8" 1920 1080 ACR0553 R240HY
Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $414
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback