Intel X99H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics76.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel X99
MotherboardIntel X99H  (all builds)
Memory56.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '23 at 11:32
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2666 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 92.7
2-Core 184
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 753
67% 566 Pts
64-Core 1274
79% 1274 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM
ASRock(1849 5131) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Lighting 95.6
Reflection 125
Parallax 168
78% 129 fps
MRender 93.9
Gravity 106
Splatting 78.9
75% 93.1 fps
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDS240G1G0A 240GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 227I
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 222 219 222 230 229 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 427
Write 225
Mixed 291
SusWrite 223
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 10.5
88% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 12.3
63% 140 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
247GB free
Firmware: 1H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 114 116 116 115 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 79.1
Write 73.6
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 116
60% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0-CMA M393B2G70EB0-CMA M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70EB0-CMA 64GB
1867, 1867, 1600, 1867 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.5% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 17.7
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 23.7" 1280 720 XMI23C3 Redmi Monitor
Typical X99H Builds (Compare 1,183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Intel X99H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback