Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG Z690 FORCE WIFI (MS-7D30)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 156%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 189%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D30
MotherboardMSI MPG Z690 FORCE WIFI (MS-7D30)  (all builds)
Memory50.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221111
Uptime2 Days
Run DateOct 15 '23 at 13:01
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$277
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 66.3
1-Core 192
2-Core 389
110% 216 Pts
4-Core 748
8-Core 1,437
130% 1,093 Pts
64-Core 2,672
165% 2,672 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 103%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$993
Asus(1043 88C8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 537.58
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (200 fps cap detected)
151% Outstanding
Lighting 200
Reflection 200
Parallax 200
163% 200 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 200
Splatting 200
164% 200 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 151%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$171
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1143 1175 1239 1257 1351 1320 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 1,910
Write 1,395
Mixed 1,336
SusWrite 1,247
330% 1,472 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 43.8
148% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,555
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 435
432% 734 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 237%
Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$171
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1386 1364 1364 1386 1356 1365 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1,955
Write 1,400
Mixed 1,367
SusWrite 1,370
341% 1,523 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 35.3
4K Mixed 36
134% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,669
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 385
421% 751 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 244%
Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$171
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1295 1263 1250 1229 1212 1245 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,876
Write 1,412
Mixed 1,336
SusWrite 1,249
329% 1,468 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 37.7
135% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,610
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 357
397% 715 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 232%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2D6000C36 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 46.4
MC Write 46.4
MC Mixed 46
132% 46.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 42.7
SC Mixed 24.2
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 109
36% 109 ns
Poor: 120%
This bench: 120%
Great: 203%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 51: 0P 5R 6G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 51 165 26.9" 1280 720 IOCFFFF 27G1S
Typical MPG Z690 FORCE WIFI (MS-7D30) Builds (Compare 2,878 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z690 FORCE WIFI (MS-7D30)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,047
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback