Asus H110M-CS/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-CS/BR  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170705
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 16 '23 at 00:42
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 176
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 310
40% 304 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 537.58
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (46 fps cap detected)
36% Below average
Lighting 45.2
Reflection 45.7
Parallax 0.2
37% 30.4 fps
MRender 47.2
Gravity 45.2
Splatting 36.4
34% 42.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 36%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 121 54 95 45 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 443
Write 372
Mixed 310
SusWrite 114
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 17.4
60% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 0.6
71% 169 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 92%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
132GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 159 162 163 175 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 179
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 165
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Avant W641GU48J7240ND Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.7% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 16.7
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 50 22 60 28.8" 1280 720 GSM59F1 LG ULTRAWIDE
Typical H110M-CS/BR Builds (Compare 667 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback