Avell G1750 MUV / C65 MUV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAvell G1750 MUV / C65 MUV  (all builds)
MotherboardAvell Avell G1750 MUV / C65 MUV
Memory22.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190819
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 17 '23 at 18:37
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 76.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 155
67% 113 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 455
40% 339 Pts
64-Core 530
33% 530 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 1064) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3758
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.4% Below average
Lighting 39.7
Reflection 65
Parallax 35.7
32% 46.8 fps
MRender 36.6
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 41.1
33% 39.5 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$38
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,030
Write 1,636
Mixed 928
269% 1,198 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 47.3
152% 49 MB/s
DQ Read 551
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 418
319% 437 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Toshiba HDWL110 1TB
924GB free
Firmware: JU000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 139 139 140 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 130
Write 141
Mixed 54.9
SusWrite 138
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 0.6
228% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C8FPD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.3% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 20.6
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 47 60 17.3" 1280 720 BOE07D2
Typical G1750 MUV / C65 MUV Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

System: Avell G1750 MUV / C65 MUV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback