Today's hottest deals

GPD G1619-04

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemGPD G1619-04  (all builds)
MotherboardGPD G1619-04
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '23 at 04:38
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 58.6
1-Core 137
2-Core 281
82% 159 Pts
4-Core 475
8-Core 848
80% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,247
77% 1,247 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
AMD(1002 0124) 3GB
Ram: 3GB, Driver: 23.9.1
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.7% Below average
Lighting 37.1
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 58.6
30% 40.6 fps
MRender 17.4
Gravity 49.3
Splatting 62.5
38% 43.1 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CE980Y38900-2TB 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10191
SusWrite @10s intervals: 669 662 659 669 672 668 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 682
Write 679
Mixed 664
SusWrite 666
152% 673 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 70.7
234% 77.8 MB/s
DQ Read 824
DQ Write 786
DQ Mixed 1,057
725% 889 MB/s
Poor: 290%
This bench: 177%
Great: 563%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G66BK7BX067 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB 23h 7500 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
101% Outstanding
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 36.4
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 37.9
SC Mixed 35.9
99% 34.7 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 101%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 10.1" 1280 720 JDI0031 GPD1001H
Typical G1619-04 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: GPD G1619-04

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 260% - Outstanding Total price: $265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback