Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 220%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 223%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics263% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160913
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 19 '23 at 17:36
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6950X-$449
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 90.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 201
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 834
76% 637 Pts
64-Core 1,419
88% 1,419 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,650
Gainward(10B0 F297) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
263% Outstanding
Lighting 337
Reflection 448
Parallax 699
275% 495 fps
MRender 517
Gravity 554
Splatting 300
358% 457 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 263%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
852GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 432 414 397 395 397 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 456
Mixed 357
SusWrite 410
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 70.5
4K Mixed 44.2
149% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 258
220% 321 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 106%
Great: 126%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 147 151 149 148 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
2TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 112 113 113 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 112
Write 98.1
Mixed 71.1
SusWrite 113
72% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3333 C16 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 38
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 29.8
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 19.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 57.8
69% 57.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 10 60 27" 2560 1377 AUS27B2 ROG PG278QR
Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $1,489
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback