Acer Aspire E1-571G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive63.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Aspire E1-571G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EA50_HC_CR
Memory4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131216
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 28 '17 at 14:37
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 82.7
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 117
60% 95.5 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 214
28% 213 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 710M
Acer(1025 0691) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.717
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 335 Series 180GB-$139
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 335t Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 470
Write 167
Mixed 240
64% 293 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 13.8
82% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 69.9
99% 186 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 88%
Initio ST500LT012-9WS14 500GB
179GB free, PID 1650
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.3% Very poor
Read 30.4
Write 22.5
Mixed 25.6
32% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.19
29% 0.42 MB/s
SAMSUNG HN-M750MBB 750GB
20GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 37.1
Write 36.2
Mixed 36.4
47% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 0.48
4K Mixed 0.26
27% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4KTF25664HZ-1G6E1 Kingston ACR16D3LS1NGG/4G 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.4% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E1-571G Builds (Compare 466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E1-571G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $125
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback