Asus PRIME X299 EDITION 30

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 149%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 163%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics175% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299 EDITION 30  (all builds)
Memory46.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220520
Uptime18.3 Days
Run DateOct 21 '23 at 20:42
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10920X-$850
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 74.4
1-Core 133
2-Core 250
83% 152 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 940
87% 726 Pts
64-Core 1,782
110% 1,782 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 85%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Titan RTX-$1,311
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
175% Outstanding
Lighting 232
Reflection 231
Parallax 264
189% 242 fps
MRender 299
Gravity 256
Splatting 207
203% 254 fps
Poor: 134%
This bench: 175%
Great: 179%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1406 1398 1445 1418 1449 1395 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1,522
Write 1,298
Mixed 694
SusWrite 1,418
277% 1,233 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 30.5
110% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 616
DQ Write 986
DQ Mixed 504
465% 702 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 217%
Great: 354%
Samsung MZPLL6T4HMLA-00005 6.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: GPJA2B3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1606 1753 1777 1739 1734 1689 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,167
Write 1589
Mixed 1,097
SusWrite 1,716
316% 1,393 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 30.1
106% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 523
DQ Write 857
DQ Mixed 278
327% 553 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 215%
Great: 309%
Seagate IronWolf 4TB (2016)-$75
3TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 134 127 133 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 166
Write 169
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 130
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF2G64AZ-3G2E1 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 49.2
MC Mixed 31.7
109% 38.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 8.8
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1280 720 ACR02CA S271HL
Typical PRIME X299 EDITION 30 Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 176%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 222%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299 EDITION 30

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $2,394
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback