Asrock J3355M

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 4.22%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	62.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	8.37% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asrock J3355M (all builds)
Memory	7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colori, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20181127
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Oct 22 '23 at 10:41
Run Duration	515 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J3355 929 User benchmarks, average bench 25% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	4.22% Terrible	Memory 4.75 1-Core 5.9 2-Core 8.7 4% 6.45 Pts	4-Core 22.6 8-Core 14.7 3% 18.6 Pts	64-Core 12 1% 12 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 4.22% Great: 31%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 5A85) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	3.05% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 2.4 3% 2.9 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 3.8 3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 3.05% Great: 2%
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 8,299 User benchmarks, average bench 96% Asus(1043 88B2) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 537.42 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	62.8% Good	Lighting 70.4 Reflection 105 Parallax 94.7 57% 89.9 fps	MRender 86.8 Gravity 98.6 Splatting 84.6 73% 90 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 100%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SSDPR-CL100-240-G3 240GB 1,084 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 39 56 32 54 31 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	8.37% Terrible	Read 53 Write 55.9 Mixed 48.5 SusWrite 46.4 12% 50.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 4.1 10% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 8.37% Great: 89%
INTENSO 128GB 3,345 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 83GB free Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 69 37 38 31 35 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	9.15% Terrible	Read 75.6 Write 108 Mixed 134 SusWrite 49.5 21% 91.7 MB/s	4K Read 3.8 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 1.9 11% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 9.15% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
A-DA AO2L16BC4R1-BR1S 0793 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1866, 1866 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.6% Very poor	MC Read 0.8 MC Write 0.7 MC Mixed 0.8 2% 0.77 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 1 SC Mixed 0.5 2% 0.6 GB/s	Latency 20.5 195% 20.5 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 17%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	1	116	16	75	0"	1280 720	Default

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical J3355M Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock J3355M

CPU
Celeron J3355IntelBench 25%, 929 samples	29x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	19x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	2x
GeForce RTX 3060NvidiaBench 96%, 8,299 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x

RAM
Se HMT125U6BFR8C-H9 Samsung 6GBHynixBench 19%, 3 samples	3x
DDR3 1866 0420 8GBA-DABench 19%, 4 samples	2x
AO2L16BC4R1-BR1S 0793 12GBA-DABench 17%, 2 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16