Today's hottest deals

HP ENVY Desktop TE02-1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 114%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ENVY Desktop TE02-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8A9B
Memory19.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230802
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 23 '23 at 13:52
Run Duration508 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700-$319
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Memory 68.4
1-Core 208
2-Core 420
118% 232 Pts
4-Core 846
8-Core 1,567
144% 1,206 Pts
64-Core 2,720
168% 2,720 Pts
Poor: 115%
This bench: 114%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$267
HP(103C 8903) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 122
Parallax 128
111% 129 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 105
Splatting 91
90% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1006 1TB
867GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,120
Write 2,300
Mixed 2,028
550% 2,483 MB/s
4K Read 56.2
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 70.3
245% 86 MB/s
DQ Read 1146
DQ Write 444
DQ Mixed 985
679% 858 MB/s
Poor: 161% Great: 466%
WDC WD20EZBX-60AYRA0 2TB
459GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 181
Write 174
Mixed 111
35% 155 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 13.4
4K Mixed 2.1
70% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 70.1
DQ Write 9.3
DQ Mixed 1.7
11% 27 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 46%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
338GB free
Firmware: 0915
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 38.1
Write 38.7
Mixed 34
28% 36.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 97%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
4GB free, PID 1603
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 20
Write 4.7
Mixed 5.2
10% 9.97 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
5GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 21.9
Write 11.2
Mixed 6.5
14% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G48C40U5.C16A1 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.5% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 21.4
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 19.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 169%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 32" 1280 720 SAM0BCB S32D850
Typical ENVY Desktop TE02-1xxx Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 280%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 328%
UFO

System: HP ENVY Desktop TE02-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $1,068
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $240Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback