Acer Veriton M430

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemAcer Veriton M430  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer RS880M05
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100421
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateOct 25 '23 at 22:17
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 70.2
1-Core 42.1
2-Core 86.2
43% 66.2 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 190
22% 170 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 340
Sapphire(174B 2154) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 2.6
4% 3.5 fps
MRender 1.2
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 50 56 55 100 48 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.9% Below average
Read 178
Write 172
Mixed 141
SusWrite 76.4
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 11.7
67% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 127
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 68.7
66% 104 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST3500418AS 500GB
336GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 101 100 101 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
57% Above average
Read 98.1
Write 91.1
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 100
63% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R334G1339U1S 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
25.9% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 9.7
25% 8.73 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8.4
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 25 60 27" 1920 1057 GSM5BB3 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical Veriton M430 Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M430

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback