Lenovo 7517C1F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics91.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemLenovo 7517C1F  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 25 '23 at 23:04
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 166
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 259
8-Core 249
34% 254 Pts
64-Core 279
17% 279 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.6% Outstanding
Lighting 101
Reflection 152
Parallax 112
83% 122 fps
MRender 163
Gravity 132
Splatting 114
109% 136 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 136%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fikwot FS810 128GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08979
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 182 217 225 228 226 MB/s
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.5% Good
Read 252
Write 232
Mixed 234
SusWrite 199
52% 229 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 59.8
4K Mixed 33.3
119% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 181
128% 159 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR1810KC58E8F1333 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 RMR5030ED58E8W1600 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.1
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 53 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACI22C3 ASUS VP228
Typical 7517C1F Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

System: Lenovo 7517C1F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $590
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback