Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	361% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Z8 Fury G5 Workstation Desktop PC (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 88C1
Memory	249.6 GB free of 256 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20230804
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 26 '23 at 08:50
Run Duration	209 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	54%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon w9-3495X 39 User benchmarks, average bench 87% CPU0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	56% Above average	Memory 76.3 1-Core 149 2-Core 160 77% 129 Pts	4-Core 208 8-Core 214 28% 211 Pts	64-Core 192 12% 192 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 109%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX A4000 4,246 User benchmarks, average bench 132% HP(103C 14AD) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 528.89 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	131% Outstanding	Lighting 177 Reflection 203 Parallax 181 144% 187 fps	MRender 193 Gravity 143 Splatting 142 128% 159 fps
Poor: 125% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 137%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HBLB-00BH7 2TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 323% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS3TGXG SusWrite @10s intervals: 2020 2534 2854 3246 3241 3247 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	361% Outstanding	Read 2,118 Write 2,610 Mixed 2,516 SusWrite 2,857 573% 2,525 MB/s	4K Read 48.9 4K Write 95 4K Mixed 77.6 224% 73.8 MB/s	DQ Read 733 DQ Write 660 DQ Mixed 772 558% 722 MB/s
Poor: 187% ↑ This bench: 361% Great: 500%
USB 3.0 Enclosure 512GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 474GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 396 397 393 374 395 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	64.7% Good	Read 287 Write 239 Mixed 325 SusWrite 378 70% 307 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 37.3 4K Mixed 23.5 76% 26.1 MB/s	DQ Read 126 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 77 76% 120 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M321R4GA3BB6-CQKET 8x31.9GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 285% 8 of 16 slots used 255GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 17.6 54% 19.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 21.4 SC Mixed 13.3 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 84 48% 84 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 415%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	62	43	60	24.1"	1280 721	HPN3485 HP Z24n G2

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 119%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 184%

UFO

GPU
RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples	7x
RTX 6000 Ada GenerationNvidiaBench 292%, 64 samples	4x
RTX A5000NvidiaBench 166%, 809 samples	3x

SSD
MZVL21T0HCLR-00BH1 1TBSamsungBench 294%, 2,979 samples	8x
MZVL22T0HBLB-00BH7 2TBSamsungBench 323%, 20 samples	3x
MTFDKBA2T0TFH-1BC1AABHA 2TBCrucialBench 357%, 238 samples	3x

RAM
M321R4GA3BB6-CQKET 8x31.9GBSamsungBench 285%, 6 samples	4x
HMCG88MEBRA107N 2x31.5GBHynixBench 133%, 3 samples	3x
HMCG78MEBRA113N 8x16GBHynixBench 361%, 6 samples	3x