Zebronics ZEB-NBC 4S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
8 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemZebronics ZEB-NBC 4S  (all builds)
MotherboardZDJ05/06 ZDJ05/06
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230924
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 26 '23 at 15:21
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 57.9
1-Core 111
2-Core 209
68% 126 Pts
4-Core 373
8-Core 629
61% 501 Pts
64-Core 772
48% 772 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1298
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Lighting 11.7
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 14.2
10% 14.6 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 24.5
Splatting 14.3
14% 18 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac 512GB 512GB
449GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0220A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 338
Write 283
Mixed 279
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 14.3
75% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 147
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 41.1
82% 161 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
JUHOR JHD3200S2216JG 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.4% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 16.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 14.1
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 140
28% 140 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 27 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0AF7
Typical ZEB-NBC 4S Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Zebronics ZEB-NBC 4S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback