Today's hottest deals

MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
13 months ago, 12 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7994
MotherboardMSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '23 at 17:22
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 100
2-Core 198
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 319
41% 312 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 545.84
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.7% Above average
Lighting 70.6
Reflection 73
Parallax 75.4
58% 73 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 70.1
Splatting 66.1
55% 67.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253256GB 256GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.30.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 92 76 54 61 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 404
Write 140
Mixed 145
SusWrite 69.2
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 15.2
75% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 75.3
DQ Mixed 19.9
38% 77.8 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 101%
Toshiba MQ02ABF100 1TB-$55
145GB free
Firmware: DS0C1E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 68 67 68 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 65.2
Write 71.3
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 67.6
44% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GD2.1827CS.007 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66% Good
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 21.9
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 18.8
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 194 29 144 23.8" 1280 720 PHLC244 PHL 242E1GJ
Typical H110M GAMING (MS-7994) Builds (Compare 1,976 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $285
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback