Today's hottest deals

Asrock X79 Extreme11

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics49.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X79 Extreme11  (all builds)
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '17 at 11:55
Run Duration368 Seconds
Run User BHR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$98
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
80% Excellent
Memory 87
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 199
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 599
62% 496 Pts
64-Core 720
45% 720 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
EVGA(3842 2882) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.71
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.1% Average
Lighting 60.8
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 75.6
50% 65.4 fps
MRender 71.4
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 45.5
48% 60.8 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 59%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70
223GB free
Firmware: 521ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.4% Above average
Read 262
Write 177
Mixed 163
44% 201 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 14.8
97% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 14.2
DQ Write 26.8
DQ Mixed 10.7
11% 17.2 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 94%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 141
Write 397
Mixed 137
51% 225 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 68.2
4K Mixed 23.8
121% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 34.2
DQ Write 74.6
DQ Mixed 56.8
43% 55.2 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 133%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 100
Write 121
Mixed 96.5
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.51
4K Mixed 0.22
75% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 114%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$80
545GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 147
Write 149
Mixed 140
109% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 2.97
4K Mixed 0.23
106% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 85%
Great: 112%
ST10000D M0004-1ZC101 10TB
5TB free, PID 2567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
93.7% Outstanding
Read 224
Write 205
Mixed 199
266% 209 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 4.24
4K Mixed 0.35
211% 6.52 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 94%
ST4000DX 001-1CE168 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 149
Write 163
Mixed 107
178% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5.46
4K Mixed 0.58
207% 2.18 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 74%
ST5000DM 000-1FK178 5TB
2TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Read 114
Write 152
Mixed 75.3
147% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 0.37
375% 3.87 MB/s
DQ Read 0.47
DQ Write 11.4
DQ Mixed 0.46
404% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 82%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
274GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 102
Write 105
Mixed 90.7
128% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.25
76% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 55%
WD Elements 1TB
202GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 76.7
Write 61.5
Mixed 61
83% 66.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.24
60% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 1TB
166GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 69.3
Write 65.6
Mixed 63.6
85% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.23
74% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 1TB
153GB free, PID 1078
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 106
Write 88.6
Mixed 65.3
106% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.17
79% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2400 C11 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
93.9% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 35.4
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.7
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Extreme11 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock X79 Extreme11

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $458
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback