Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop TP3604VA_TP3604VA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive98.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop TP3604VA_TP3604VA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK TP3604VA
Memory2.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3200 x 2000 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230310
Uptime9.2 Days
Run DateOct 27 '23 at 13:12
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 40.3
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 159
52% 96.7 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 462
48% 388 Pts
64-Core 802
50% 802 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 1643) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 15.6
10% 14.2 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 19.6
Splatting 12.3
12% 15.4 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ1T0HALB-00000 1TB
838GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 383 258 230 284 267 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 731
Write 637
Mixed 643
SusWrite 311
130% 580 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 42.9
120% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 299
213% 276 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 21
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 18.3
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 192
21% 192 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 16" 1280 720 SDC4178
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop TP3604VA_TP3604VA Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop TP3604VA_TP3604VA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback