Lenovo 80NT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80NT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo ideapad 5
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150810
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 28 '23 at 05:01
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 55.7
1-Core 63.8
2-Core 112
46% 77.1 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 149
18% 139 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 3804) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4627
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.5% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 5.5
4% 4.8 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 7.2
5% 5.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.5%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
341GB free
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 298 164 296 276 293 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 271
Write 312
Mixed 280
SusWrite 272
64% 284 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 32.9
104% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 337
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 154
153% 248 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 125%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
236GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 30 29 25 36 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 64.8
Write 62.6
Mixed 44
SusWrite 29.9
37% 50.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 61%
SanDisk 3.2 Gen1 125GB
107GB free, PID 55b1
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 27 21 27 26 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
6.49% Terrible
Read 2.7
Write 22.6
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 22.9
20% 12.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.49%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3160ME68FAF1600 0012 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36.5% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 10.1
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 10.8
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 25 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15CB
Typical 80NT Builds (Compare 600 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80NT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback