Today's hottest deals

Acer Swift SF314-43

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-43  (all builds)
MotherboardLN Sake_CA
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210728
Uptime24.5 Days
Run DateOct 29 '23 at 14:55
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 67.8
1-Core 136
2-Core 273
84% 159 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 821
85% 682 Pts
64-Core 889
55% 889 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1537) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.40.44
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 18
Parallax 27.3
17% 22 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 20.2
16% 19.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA1T0QFD 1TB
900GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 918 962 912 1011 977 999 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,096
Write 1,026
Mixed 874
SusWrite 963
223% 990 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 49.1
160% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 831
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 391
333% 503 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 177%
Great: 301%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown H9HCNNNBKMMLXR-NEE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
78.8% Very good
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 29.2
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 23.2
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 0 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14D4
Typical Swift SF314-43 Builds (Compare 341 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF314-43

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback