Gigabyte GA-Z790 AORUS PRO X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 446%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 611%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics389% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive606% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z790 AORUS PRO X  (all builds)
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '23 at 15:32
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900K-$500
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 76.7
1-Core 236
2-Core 464
132% 259 Pts
4-Core 875
8-Core 1,601
148% 1,238 Pts
64-Core 4,359
270% 4,359 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 120%
Great: 137%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,500
Gigabyte(1458 40E4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
389% Outstanding
Lighting 624
Reflection 586
Parallax 784
509% 665 fps
MRender 532
Gravity 580
Splatting 296
367% 469 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 389%
Great: 407%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000D2048G 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4622 4522 4696 4891 4853 4846 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
606% Outstanding
Read 2713
Write 4,601
Mixed 3,489
SusWrite 4,738
884% 3,885 MB/s
4K Read 84.2
4K Write 277
4K Mixed 128
439% 163 MB/s
DQ Read 1,800
DQ Write 1448
DQ Mixed 1,560
1,185% 1,603 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 606%
Great: 614%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U6000C3016G-BLARW 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
143% Outstanding
MC Read 59.8
MC Write 51.4
MC Mixed 54.6
158% 55.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 49.1
SC Mixed 27
90% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 143%
This bench: 143%
Great: 200%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 4 212 48 60 34" 1280 720 AOCB306 U34G3G3R3
Typical GA-Z790 AORUS PRO X Builds (Compare 303 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 459%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 127%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 609%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z790 AORUS PRO X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $2,365
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback