Gigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive482% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230118
Uptime3 Days
Run DateNov 02 '23 at 03:10
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D-$310
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 182
2-Core 367
115% 215 Pts
4-Core 717
8-Core 1,330
122% 1,024 Pts
64-Core 1,708
106% 1,708 Pts
Poor: 105%
This bench: 115%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
MSI(1462 3980) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.10.2
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 134
Parallax 280
113% 184 fps
MRender 245
Gravity 143
Splatting 199
160% 196 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 123%
Great: 129%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$190
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3963 4293 2725 1631 1711 1614 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
482% Outstanding
Read 3,794
Write 4,450
Mixed 2,882
SusWrite 2656
776% 3,446 MB/s
4K Read 65.7
4K Write 204
4K Mixed 90.5
324% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,704
DQ Write 1,372
DQ Mixed 1,513
1,139% 1,529 MB/s
Poor: 261%
This bench: 482%
Great: 564%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C36-8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
174% Outstanding
MC Read 77.3
MC Write 49.1
MC Mixed 59.6
177% 62 GB/s
SC Read 63
SC Write 60.7
SC Mixed 54.3
170% 59.3 GB/s
Latency 53.3
75% 53.3 ns
Poor: 116%
This bench: 174%
Great: 174%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 34" 1280 720 GBT3403 G34WQC A
Typical GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX Builds (Compare 564 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 418%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650 AORUS ELITE AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $2,240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback