Intel H310C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel H310C  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210317
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 03 '23 at 17:25
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$45
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.4% Average
Memory 64.2
1-Core 57.4
2-Core 79
43% 66.9 Pts
4-Core 95.4
8-Core 116
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)
Intel(8086 2015) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
2.81% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 3.5
2% 3.03 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 6.6
4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.81%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Aoluska A6-256G 256GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2272P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 44 39 43 33 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
20% Very poor
Read 300
Write 28.9
Mixed 138
SusWrite 41.7
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 3.5
18% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20%
Great: 82%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
322GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 78 59 70 60 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
48% Average
Read 98.1
Write 100
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 69.1
59% 80.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.5% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 3.9
12% 4.4 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 26 8 60 15.5" 1280 720 ACR0065 Acer X183H
Typical H310C Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Intel H310C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback