Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive44.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory18.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220516
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 04 '23 at 03:58
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 77.6
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
84% 155 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 649
73% 572 Pts
64-Core 656
41% 656 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 84%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$225
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 545.92
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 91.7
Reflection 90
Parallax 87.4
75% 89.7 fps
Gravity 79.8
Splatting 0.1
30% 40 fps
Poor: 65% Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$39
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 1.6 1.9 2.8 114 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 419
Write 227
Mixed 259
SusWrite 56.1
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 16.5
67% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 72.2
DQ Mixed 37.7
43% 74.3 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 53%
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB
187GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 59 61 60 60 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 61.8
Write 46.2
Mixed 43.4
SusWrite 59.8
39% 52.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
99% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
179GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 59 62 59 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
33% Below average
Read 54.9
Write 54.2
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 60
38% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33%
Great: 43%
Seagate ST250LT020-1AE14C 250GB
83GB free
Firmware: 0001EXM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 67 67 67 67 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 70.1
Write 75
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 66.9
48% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS16G4D26BFSE.16FD TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 24GB
2866, 2866 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.2% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 18
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 19.4
54% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2401 24B1W1G5
Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 4,026 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $261
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback