Today's hottest deals

Samsung 500R5M/500R5W/501R5M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 500R5M/500R5W/501R5M  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP500R5M-X09HK
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170216
Uptime13.9 Days
Run DateDec 30 '17 at 11:30
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 92%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 98.4
2-Core 180
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 273
36% 273 Pts
64-Core 273
17% 273 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 940MX
Sanyo(144D C792) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7290
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
9.89% Terrible
Lighting 13.5
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 10.6
11% 11.4 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 8.87
8% 9.35 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.89%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-000 128GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT21K0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 467
Mixed 498
110% 494 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 97.4
4K Mixed 35.2
158% 57.6 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 20.1
85% 194 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
331GB free
Firmware: AM003F Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 105
Write 87
Mixed 82.9
69% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.55
4K Mixed 0.22
73% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 60%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
1GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
7.02% Terrible
Read 18.6
Write 14.8
Mixed 12.6
19% 15.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.25
4K Write 0.03
4K Mixed 0.59
37% 1.62 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.02%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
66.1% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 20.5
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 500R5M/500R5W/501R5M Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 500R5M/500R5W/501R5M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback