Medion MS-7848

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMedion MS-7848  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION MS-7848
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '23 at 19:55
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1268L v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 75.8
2-Core 149
58% 99 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 369
39% 314 Pts
64-Core 379
24% 379 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics P4600
MSI(1462 7848) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4642
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
2.75% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 5.4
2% 3.5 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 2
Splatting 4.2
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.75%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 415 417 425 382 296 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 447
Mixed 414
SusWrite 390
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 35.5
123% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 318
240% 322 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 15.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 15.8
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 23.5" 1280 720 PHLC0C0 Philips 247E4
Typical MS-7848 Builds (Compare 692 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Medion MS-7848

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback