Today's hottest deals

MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C96
MotherboardMSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)  (all builds)
Memory19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '23 at 18:49
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 45%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 84
1-Core 129
2-Core 214
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 774
77% 629 Pts
64-Core 971
60% 971 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3FDA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 121
Parallax 132
103% 126 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 127
Splatting 111
112% 141 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AI1 512GB
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 695 862 894 807 50 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 969
Write 907
Mixed 834
SusWrite 562
184% 818 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 52.2
194% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 882
DQ Mixed 396
358% 524 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 159%
Great: 203%
WD WD10JUCX-63WPNY0 1TB
420GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 93 93 96 95 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 92.1
Write 98.6
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 94.2
61% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 64%
Adaptec Array 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 39 34 33 23 32 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 190
Write 40.7
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 32.8
60% 81.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 90%
Adaptec Array 1TB
898GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 70 67 67 59 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Read 61.3
Write 97.4
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 65.9
52% 70.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 95%
Adaptec Array 499GB
406GB free
Firmware: V1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 54 54 54 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 53.9
Write 65.2
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 54.7
40% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C17D4/8GX KF3600C16D4/16GX 24GB
3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.3% Excellent
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 29.1
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.6
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 29
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 84%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 24.1" 1280 720 PHL08C8 Philips 240S4
Typical A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96) Builds (Compare 2,095 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback