Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-G5 MF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G5 MF  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230210
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '23 at 11:34
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
68% Good
Memory 53.7
1-Core 126
2-Core 249
75% 143 Pts
4-Core 459
8-Core 550
65% 504 Pts
64-Core 848
52% 848 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 68%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4050 (Laptop)
Clevo(1558 A550) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4601
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
20.9% Poor
Lighting 24.6
Reflection 30.4
Parallax 23.9
20% 26.3 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 23.2
22% 28.2 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 112%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CA6-8D512 512GB
275GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ER23401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 787 615 651 717 649 662 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,923
Write 1,066
Mixed 645
SusWrite 680
238% 1,078 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 53.2
205% 78.5 MB/s
DQ Read 914
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 725
492% 619 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 206%
Great: 389%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905624-054.A00G Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
64.5% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 24.3
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0910
Typical GA-G5 MF Builds (Compare 343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G5 MF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback