HP All-in-One Desktop 24-cr0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics3.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemHP All-in-One Desktop 24-cr0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B4E
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '23 at 09:57
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Silver 7120U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.77% Terrible
Memory 10.9
1-Core 34.2
2-Core 39.9
16% 28.3 Pts
4-Core 48.6
8-Core 56.4
7% 52.5 Pts
64-Core 20.9
1% 20.9 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.77%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8B4E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.75% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 11.3
5% 9.47 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.2
1% 1.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.75%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-256G-1006 256GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 296 320 328 263 285 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 312
Write 220
Mixed 261
SusWrite 288
61% 270 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 14.7
54% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 95.4
DQ Write 78.4
DQ Mixed 93
68% 88.9 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
20.5% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 6.3
21% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 6.9
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 364
11% 364 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 5 3 60 23.8" 1280 720 HPN4066 HP ALL-in-One
Typical All-in-One Desktop 24-cr0xxx Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP All-in-One Desktop 24-cr0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback