Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2314 26 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	65% Good	Memory 75.4 1-Core 98 2-Core 197 70% 124 Pts	4-Core 313 8-Core 336 43% 324 Pts	64-Core 326 20% 326 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 65% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	4.54% Terrible	Lighting 5.4 Reflection 4.3 Parallax 7.2 4% 5.63 fps	MRender 3.6 Gravity 6.8 Splatting 6.7 5% 5.7 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.54% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green M.2 2280 240GB 276 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: 42059100 SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 145 119 124 124 125 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 426 Write 312 Mixed 366 SusWrite 163 71% 317 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 53.4 4K Mixed 32 109% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 263 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 29.4 70% 150 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMAA2GU7CJR8N-XN 1x16GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	58.6% Above average	MC Read 21 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 19.2 58% 20.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 21.8 SC Mixed 19.6 55% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 89.5 45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 59%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	42	29	24	34.1"	3440 1440	SAM7144 LS34A650U

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

CPU
Xeon E-2314IntelBench 60%, 26 samples	2x
Xeon E-2336IntelBench 69%, 21 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TBBench 430%, 44,185 samples	1x
Green M.2 2280 240GBWDBench 59%, 276 samples	1x

RAM
HMAA2GU7CJR8N-XN 000000000C01 32GBUnknownBench 102%, 2 samples	1x
HMAA2GU7CJR8N-XN 1x16GBUnknownBench 48%, 18 samples	1x
9ASF2G72AZ-3G2B1 002C00000C01 18ASF2G72AZ-3G2A1 32GBUnknownBench 109%, 1 sample	1x